Oh dear, has it been a year since I posted? In that time I've moved house, got a new job, got a new dog and been made redundant. Now I've got time to blog again!
The Occupy Movement got to London/the UK on 15 October 2011 and I'm not overstating to say in my view it is the best hope we have for moving our society toward economic justice after decades of Governments that deliberately:
- dismantled social solidarity
- undermined organised labour
- promoted a culture of selfish individualism
- freed the financial sector to gamble with the whole global economy and our livelihoods
Creative, high profile direct action by sizeable groups is what it takes now to push for progress. This situation creates a particular extreme tension though - this type of action tends to bring out the fascism of the ruling class, and this fascism is already likely to be provoked by:
- the current and inevitability of future economic crises
- the class and other social hatred that is being provoked by the current populist, right-wing government
It's a bit of a tinderbox, but a few things are in our favour including:
- distrust and dislike of the financial sector is ongoing in spite of politicians unwillingness to seriously engage with the issue
- distrust and dislike of the political class, particularly since the expenses scandal
- the fact that it the occupation is peaceful
- the lack of movement figurehead individuals - the media tends to make movements be about these individuals and that tends to silence the messages and aims of movements and later discredit movements when figurehead individuals cock up and or sell out
- the good fortune of ending up getting sanctuary from a high-profile cathedral and the contribution of the resulting religious and church discourse to keeping the issues and the occupation itself in the public eye
- the police have been hampered from using violent and oppressive practices following the outcry from methods used at protests in recent years
Unfortunately in this country the media discourse is inevitably extremely poor when it comes to movements for social/economic justice. Even columnists who claim to have some sympathy for the occupation roll out the same lazy claim that the occupation is disjointed and aimless. I wonder if they would prefer it had a 5 year plan and prospective parliamentary candidates? Even the most cursory investigation of Occupy LSX would tell any commentator that:
- it is a direct democracy and decisions on aims for the occupation are being made at the on site
General Assembly, the minutes of which are on the website. - This direct democracy resulted in an
Initial Statement at the occupation- Within the first two weeks discourse at the occupation also resulted in specific demands for the
democratisation of the City of London (the financial district), something that
previous Governments have also seen the need for.
It's an interesting time to be a Londoner.